Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Colin Van Beem vs Lennert Van Der Linden Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Beem vs Linden analysis and find out who is favored!
Colin Van Beem vs Lennert Van Der Linden Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Beem 1 - 2 Linden
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Beem has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Linden has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Beem, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Linden has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Beem has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Linden has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Beem has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Linden winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Beem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 49/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Linden has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 24/ 11), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Beem winning 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Beem winning 2 and Linden winning 5. The last match between Beem and Linden was at the Turkey F18 (Antalya), 10-05-2017, First, Clay with Colin Van Beem getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:37:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Beem and Linden have played a deciding set 1 times, with Beem winning 1 times and Linden 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Beem winning 0, and Linden 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Beem has played against opponents with an average rank of while Linden has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Beem has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Linden has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Beem has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Linden has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
537
High
32
Age
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard0
1
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
439
High
34
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
56% (191-153)
Career Total W/L
59% (106-74)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Colin Van Beem | Lennert Van Der Linden |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 5 |
| Games Won | 28 | 36 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 12 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:0 | 1:37:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (107/210) | 67% (126/188) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (69/107) | 63% (80/126) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (46/103) | 55% (34/62) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (9/21) | 43% (12/28) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (74/188) | 45% (95/210) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Colin Van Beem
Player
Lennert Van Der Linden
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Lennert Van Der Linden
Player
Colin Van Beem
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Lennert Van Der Linden
Player
Colin Van Beem
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
39%
(
27 of
70)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Colin Van Beem | Lennert Van Der Linden |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Colin Van Beem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Stefan Loncar
Player
Colin Van Beem
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Goran Radanovic
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 7-6(0) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
Player
Colin Van Beem
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Patrik Rikl
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Colin Van Beem
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Gokberk Ergeneman
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Lennert Van Der Linden Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Lootsma
Player
Lennert Van Der Linden
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve %
53%
(
18 of
34)
2
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
29
Total Points Won
23
|
4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Grassi Mazzuchi
Player
Lennert Van Der Linden
60%
(
6 of
10)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
5 of
6)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
10
Total Points Won
6
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Lennert Van Der Linden
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Moez Echargui
Player
Lennert Van Der Linden
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lennert Van Der Linden
Player
Huixin Wang
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lennert Van Der Linden
Player
Yuri Syromolotov Netrebin
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Issam Haitham Taweel
Player
Lennert Van Der Linden
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
7
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lennert Van Der Linden
Player
Christian Hirschmueller
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
5-7 6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lennert Van Der Linden
Player
Kristjan Tamm
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cristian Carli
Player
Lennert Van Der Linden
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Beem Vs Linden Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
